Reviews Without Stars

With a very few exceptions, I’ve stopped giving stars on book reviews. Why?

Some books I read entirely for entertainment. Some books I read and discover there are deeper themes, viewpoints that make me think, and may have a lasting impact on how I see the world. Some books I read and fall in love with the author’s writing: how they use words, the grace and precision of their sentences, their images, their skill with the craft. Some authors are journeymen, shall we say, conveying a good story competently, but without a master’s touch. In my eyes.

Books I love, others don’t. Books I dislike, others love. That’s a given for all art. But here’s my first reason not to give stars: my opinions change. A book I disliked (or didn’t understand) in its first reading – The Buried Giant, Kazuo Ishiguro’s dream-like story about the mutability of time and memory – refused to remove itself from my mind. On its second reading, I was entranced. It remains a difficult book, hard to categorize, allegoric, but if the purpose of art is to change the way we see or think about the world, it’s succeeded for me. But if I’d rated it back in 2015, I’d have given it 3 stars, or less.

That leads me into the second reason: how people perceive a star rating. Three stars to me says ‘it’s ok, an average book.’ And that’s fine. Not every book (or movie, or painting, or meal, or hotel) is a masterpiece, even within its genre. But more and more I see authors thinking their work automatically deserves five stars. I see some authors being upset with four-star ratings, focusing on the stars, not the words in the review. I’d much rather my review was read as meaningful critique. So: no stars. Take the time to absorb what I say – that’s what matters.

The third reason is one of respect. In today’s interconnected world, very often I know – at least through social media – the author whose work I’m reviewing. Writers reviewing other writers know how much blood, toil, tears and sweat goes into writing a book, and we are loathe to undermine that effort. Overall, I think perhaps we’re a little too nice to each other, because of that. But a review without a star rating, one written with skill and thought – a proper critique, not a criticism – should indicate to other readers – and the writer – what I thought the strengths, and perhaps the weaknesses, of the book are.

Will I ever give another star rating?  Yes, sometimes. I will star-rate a book for a debut author, especially if they have next to no reviews and if I can write an overall positive review. I will star-rate an exceptional book, one that a decade from now I’m pretty sure I’ll still be thinking about. But otherwise, no. Not any longer.

4 thoughts on “Reviews Without Stars

  1. You can review on GR without rating (add the book to want to read shelf, go to your shelf, go to ‘write a review’ beside the book’s title,,and enter it without stars. It accepts it.), so I’m mostly limiting my reviews to my website and there, unless I feel it is a really spectacular book. I’d much rather see a well written review.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I never put stars on my actual review BUT I have to rate them when I transfer them onto Amazon , Waterstones Goodreads et al. I feel if people read my actual review, they will understand what I think about the book, rather than an at a glance false measurement. After all, what am I rating them in comparison with – other books in the same genre? A book I have recently read? The author’s previous books? A notion of literary perfection?

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I know how much reviews are worth to authors – personally, as an author who gets next to no reviews – so for that reason I hesitate on deciding not to post reviews to sites that require ratings. At the same thing, everything you have said here resonates with me (and is also part of why, if possible, I like to give a book at least a couple weeks before I write my review, most of the time), and I have found I really enjoy writing no-rating reviews like I am doing on my site (and how S. Kaeth’s Indie Story Geek indiestorygeek.com accommodates – uses – that kind of approach).

    Like

    1. We all have to make our own decisions about how we write reviews and where we post them. In part, I found myself writing thoughtful reviews, and then thinking ‘but I have no idea how to star this’ because I may have liked the themes of the book but not the writing style, for example.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s